Expert Advice When You Need It Most

Back to Search Results

Bryan M. Abramoske

Bryan M. Abramoske

6.6

Good
Experience 2.5 star rating
Industry Recognition 2.0 star rating
Professional Conduct 5.0 star rating

What is the Avvo Rating?

Client Reviews

Not yet reviewed
Former client? Write a review
No professional misconduct found.

Overview

Practice Areas
Chart?chs=124x124&cht=p&chp=4
  • 50% Litigation
  • 50% Constitutional

Contact Information

Languages Spoken
  • English

About Me

Photos (1)

Videos (0)

Bryan practices in the area of civil litigation and insurance defense with a focus on toxic tort and complex products liability litigation, representing... more

View all photos and/or videos

References

Client Reviews

How would you rate this lawyer?

If you're a current or former client, share your thoughts (anonymously, if you prefer). Would you recommend this lawyer to other clients?

Review this lawyer

Peer Endorsements

Endorse a fellow lawyer, get more visits to your profile

In addition to providing a simple way to express your gratitude to fellow lawyers, any time you add an endorsement to a peer's profile, a link to your profile will appear on it.

Endorse this lawyer

Résumé

 

License

3 years since Bryan M. Abramoske was first licensed to practice law.

State License status Year acquired Last updated by Avvo
Connecticut Active 2010 01/31/2012
Massachusetts Active 2008 05/05/2012
We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.

Work Experience
Position Duration
Associate at Cetrulo & Capone LLP 2009–present
Associate at Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge, LLP 2008–2009

Education
School Major Degree Graduated
Suffolk University Law School Law JD - Juris Doctor 2008
College of the Holy Cross History BA - Bachelor of Arts 2003

Awards
Award Name Granting Organization Date
Jurisprudence Awards in Constitutional Law and Criminal Law Suffolk University Law School

Associations
Position Association Name Duration
Boston Bar Association
Defense Research Institute

Portfolio

Publications
Article Publication Date
IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT THEY INTENDED: THE NEED FOR OBJECTIVE PERMISSIBILITY REVIEW OF POLICE-CREATED EXIGENCIES IN “KNOCK AND TALK” INVESTIGATIONS Suffolk University Law Review 2008

Related Lawyer Searches