Skip to main content
Charles Henry Fasoldt

Charles Fasoldt’s Legal Cases

76 total


  • OUI-Drugs--Worcester District Court

    Practice Area:
    DUI & DWI
    Date:
    Nov 23, 2010
    Outcome:
    Dismissed
    Description:
    Client was stopped on I-190 for weaving. Cocaine, tinfoil, and smoking device were found in plain view. Client made statements that she had just "cooked up a bag." Statements were suppressed as violative of Miranda. DRE conducted at barracks; that was suupressed as well. Case dismissed after Statements and Drug Recognition Evaluation (DRE) suppressed.
  • OUI-1st Offense--Plymouth District Court

    Practice Area:
    DUI & DWI
    Date:
    Dec 01, 2010
    Outcome:
    Dismissed
    Description:
    Case dismissed after client had been in default for 22 years.
  • Chemical Test Refusal Appeal of RMV's Decision Granted

    Practice Area:
    DUI & DWI
    Date:
    Sep 22, 2010
    Outcome:
    RMV's decision reversed
    Description:
    RMV's decision overturned by District Court in case where the client was deemed to have "refused" the breath test. After proving to the District Court judge that client had tried 4 times to provied a valid breath sample, but was unable to, due to an injury sustained in a car accident, the client's 180-day license loss was reversed.
  • OUI-1st Offense, Breath Test .10--Westborough District Court

    Practice Area:
    DUI & DWI
    Date:
    Dec 07, 2010
    Outcome:
    Not Guilty
    Description:
    Client was stopped at roadblock. She passed all FSTs, but was arrested after failing the PBT. She then made the mistake of taking the evidential breath test in the BATMOBILE; she blew a .10. Jury waived trial w/ expert witness--Not Guilty.
  • OUI-4th Offense, Assault w/ Dangerous Weapon--BMC Central

    Practice Area:
    DUI & DWI
    Date:
    Feb 24, 2011
    Outcome:
    Not Guilty on both counts
    Description:
    Client drove wrong way down one-way street on New Year's Eve in Boston. Police detective alleged that client tried to run him over. Client was taken from car roughly and arrested. It was assumed he was impaired by alcohol. No FSTs were offered. No BT
  • Assault and Battery--Malden District Court

    Practice Area:
    Criminal Defense
    Date:
    Feb 08, 2011
    Outcome:
    Dismissed
    Description:
    Client was accused of punching and scratching ex-fiance. Case was dismissed upon "Accord and Satisfaction."
  • OUI-1st Offense--Cambridge District Court

    Practice Area:
    DUI & DWI
    Date:
    Mar 02, 2011
    Outcome:
    Dismissed
    Description:
    Client was stopped after State Trooper ran his license plate and discovered that the registered owner of the vehicle had a suspended license. Client displayed standard signs of impairment. His girlfriend, who was passed out in the front seat, vomited while the Trooper was talking with client.
  • Indecent Exposure--Waltham District Court

    Practice Area:
    Criminal Defense
    Date:
    Mar 23, 2011
    Outcome:
    Dismissed
    Description:
    Police officer saw client urinating on the sidewalk outside of a bar. As the officer approached, he told client to "stop." Client ran away, without zipping up; officer caught up with client and placed him under arrest. Client was on probation for OUI at the time.
  • Assault and Battery--Cambridge Juvenile Court

    Practice Area:
    Criminal Defense
    Date:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Outcome:
    Dismissed
    Description:
    Teenage daughter was accused of striking and pushing her mother during a family dispute. Mother did not want case to go forward. An "Accord and Satisfaction" was executed and accepted by the judge. Case dismissed
  • OUI-1st--Dedham District Court (Breath Test Excluded)

    Practice Area:
    DUI & DWI
    Date:
    Apr 08, 2011
    Outcome:
    Motion to Suppress Breath Test Allowed
    Description:
    Client consented to breath test at police station; she blew a 0.09. Filed a MTS the breath test. A booking video showed that the police officer did not consistently observe the defendant for 15 minutes, as required by law. The judge agreed and allowed the motion. Consequently, the BT is excluded from evidence.