No photo
Asker
Posted over 2 years ago.

She is biased and prejudice, besides having anyone reasonable assume she is under 170.1 or 3, at least it seems so according to the CA judge benchguidelines for recuse. She is not going to hear this case at all; so if do nothing, it is done, so what is the harm? My other option is a Supreme court writ of certiorari since violated federal PAKA mainly, but also WAVA; and did not abide by the state statutes for UCCJEA which means not in conformaty with PKPA. So the plan was to recuse, and as soon as file that work on Supreme court writ since if she is not recuse, I have 10 days to file a writ. The writ when approved will not go back to that judge I am assuming if I request since will also attach the recuse motion. I understand this is alot of work, and am rather smart and researched it, but if I do nothing; my children will go to a man who has abused them is depressed and suicidal, and does not want tthe children, just doesn't want to pay support. His plan is to leave my young children everynight with a sex pervert while he works, and beat them the other times. He has not seen them since abusing them with police,child services, and therapy started 17 months ago. He is a police officer and everyone thinks that makes him a good person when the evidence clearly shows he will abuse and possibly kill them alog with him. Not a joke or exaggerated. Also state and federal laws say CA has jurisdiction first filed and home state, and this judge is clueless, and will not even hear the case. So many things, so complex to get into here. But what other options are available? I will do everything humanly possible to protect my children and put in ALL the time and energy to do so.

No photo
Asker
Posted over 2 years ago.

Also can I incorporate the recuse with both the reasons of 170.1 or 3 AND 170.6?