No photo
Asker
Posted over 1 year ago.

Incorrect. And please do not respond to any further of my questions. You are institutionalized and prejudiced.

Richard Forrest Gould-Saltman
Richard Forrest Gould-Saltman, Divorce / Separation Lawyer - Los Angeles, CA
Posted over 1 year ago.

CCP 391:
As used in this title, the following terms have the following meanings:

(a)"Litigation" means any civil action or proceeding, commenced, maintained or pending in any state or federal court.

(b)"Vexatious litigant" means a person who does any of the following:

(1)In the immediately preceding seven-year period has commenced, prosecuted, or maintained in propria persona at least five litigations other than in a small claims court that have been (i) finally determined adversely to the person or (ii) unjustifiably permitted to remain pending at least two years without having been brought to trial or hearing.

(2)After a litigation has been finally determined against the person, repeatedly relitigates or attempts to relitigate, in propria persona, either (i) the validity of the determination against the same defendant or defendants as to whom the litigation was finally determined or (ii) the cause of action, claim, controversy, or any of the issues of fact or law, determined or concluded by the final determination against the same defendant or defendants as to whom the litigation was finally determined.

(3)In any litigation while acting in propria persona, repeatedly files unmeritorious motions, pleadings, or other papers, conducts unnecessary discovery, or engages in other tactics that are frivolous or solely intended to cause unnecessary delay.

(4)Has previously been declared to be a vexatious litigant by any state or federal court of record in any action or proceeding based upon the same or substantially similar facts, transaction, or occurrence.

No photo
Asker
Posted over 1 year ago.

I probably know vexatious litigant law better than you. Like I said, please don't respond to my question any further. You have no idea what you are talking about. My question was about property and distribution but in your prejudice and institutionalization you focused on the only aspect of the information that you were programmed to.