Mark Robert Barr

Mark Robert Barr Denver Immigration Attorney

Posted over 13 years ago.

No, it isn't. (c)(31) is for an APPROVED I-360. You can file it concurrently but will still have to wait a long time for the I-360 approval before the EAD can issue.

However, because the I-360 was filed concurrently with an adjustment application, the (c)(9) category should have been used, since that only requires a pending I-485, and EAD issuance should be in 60-90 days.

No photo

Asker

Posted over 13 years ago.

I guess I should have use (c)(9). I can't wait for my I-360 approval to get a work permit. I have pending I-485.

David Eli Larson

David Eli Larson Dayton Immigration Attorney

Posted over 13 years ago.

Mark is correct that (c)(9) is the proper code to use. I am assuming your spouse is a US citizen based on your lawyer submitting the I-485 at the same time as the I-360. If your spouse is not a US citizen, you will have to wait longer than the 3 months to get work authorization. Ask your lawyer to check the status of your I-765, or use the USCIS Customer Service Number, 1-800-375-5283, to check the status yourself. You can ask the customer service representative to inform the Vermont Service Center that you are married to a US citizen and are eligible for work authorization immediately because of your pending I-485. Make sure you have your VSC receipt number when you call.

David Eli Larson

David Eli Larson Dayton Immigration Attorney

Posted over 13 years ago.

Mark, are people experiencing longer processing times for the EAD when the (c)(31) code is used even though the I-485 is submitted concurrently?

No photo

Asker

Posted over 13 years ago.

Yes my husband is a USC.

David Eli Larson

David Eli Larson Dayton Immigration Attorney

Posted over 13 years ago.

Good, don't freak out. Just follow up and have your lawyer follow up.

No photo

Asker

Posted over 13 years ago.

Ok thank you. Should i ask my lawyer to change it to Category (C)(9) instead of (c)(31)?

Mark Robert Barr

Mark Robert Barr Denver Immigration Attorney

Posted over 13 years ago.

David, I don't know the answer to that question. As I mentioned to the posted, it's entirely possible that USCIS will still treat it as a (c)(9), rather than (c)(31), when the I-485 shows in the system. You would think there would be some built-in flexibility, since a lot of these filings are done pro se. I don't have first hand knowledge, because I think we've been pretty good about filing them as (c)(9) where appropriate. Probably a decent idea for the lawyer to supplment with clarification, though, rather than just waiting and hoping that the Service sorts it out.

David Eli Larson

David Eli Larson Dayton Immigration Attorney

Posted over 13 years ago.

To view this email as a web page, go here.
<http://click.mail5.avvo.com/?qs=7559061590418ee730224c75c49182a7d9c9b66
5c21a34c8a2931397b758d6d85538d5ed0cfc5db2>


The important thing is just to let the VSC know that you are eligible
for work authorization immediately.



David E. Larson

Altick & Corwin Co., L.P.A.

1590 Fifth Third Center

One South Main Street

Dayton, Ohio 45402-2206

Phone; 937-223-1201

Fax: 937-223-5100





ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED: DO NOT FORWARD WITHOUT PERMISSION. This
e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. This communication may contain material protected by the
attorney-client privilege or other applicable privilege. If you are not
the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the
e-mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this
e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing,
or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please immediately notify ALTICK & CORWIN CO.,
L.P.A., by return e-mail to helpdesk@altickcorwin.com. After proper
notification, you must permanently dispose of this email and all
associated attachments.

IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: To ensure compliance with new requirements
of the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that, to the extent any
advice relating to a Federal tax issue is contained in this
communication, including in any attachments, it was not written or
intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (a) avoiding
any tax related penalties that may be imposed on you or any other person
under the Internal Revenue Code, or (b) promoting, marketing or
recommending to another person any transaction or matter addressed in
this communication. PLEASE BE NOTIFIED THAT OUR ORDINARY LETTERS AND
E-MAILS TO YOU ARE NOT INTENDED TO MEET THE "COVERED OPINION" TEST. If
you seek materials that do meet this test and thus may be relied upon
for preventing federal tax penalties, please feel free to specifically
request them.