No photo
Asker
Posted over 1 year ago.

Thank you, but for what purpose? According to their policies, his termination is justifiable and Indiana is an "employment-at-will" state. However, I do think that prohibiting him from seeking work in an entity that has almost a complete monopoly of medical facilities in the state is very heavy-handed given his history and the fact that this event (in my eyes, of course) was neither "severe" nor "pervasive." However, are you implying that we may be able to seek legal recourse?

No photo
Asker
Posted over 1 year ago.

Nevermind, you don't need to answer that. I got over-excited for a second. I will look around for Employment Lawyers in the area.