If the doctor neglected to monitor a condition and then up until recently (a year or 2) was when I realized there was permanent nerve damage, do you still think that is still related to the original condition he began treating me for in 2004? See, I didn't realize that the issue was of permanent nature until the last few years. I was just wondering because of how dismissive he behaved after I stated there was a problem and the fact that his notes in my medical records contradict each other and what he told me all along. Thanks.
Asker
Posted over 13 years ago.
If the doctor neglected to monitor a condition and then up until recently (a year or 2) was when I realized there was permanent nerve damage, do you still think that is still related to the original condition he began treating me for in 2004? See, I didn't realize that the issue was of permanent nature until the last few years. I was just wondering because of how dismissive he behaved after I stated there was a problem and the fact that his notes in my medical records contradict each other and what he told me all along. Thanks.