Thank you for responding. I misunderstood slapp protections, I thought they were to protect against a defendant from filing numerous counter suits purely to drive up the costs of litigation etc. Which is a tactic this group uses. I was anticipating what the other side would do in a lawsuit. Investors live here, prop etc is in North carolina. Again thank you for responding, and helping better understand, so that I can hopefully make the right decision.
In California one would use sanctions as a way to stop bad faith tactics. When a party does it in various lawsuits they can be determined a "vexatious litigant" to curb litigation abuse.